Monday, March 24, 2014

Blog 7: Differentiated Instruction: Getting Personal with Technology


When you are walking in the classroom in Forest Lake Elementary there are several things going on, but one thing is happening everywhere in the classroom: Students are thoroughly engaged in learning. Forest Lake, is a technology magnet public school that deals with grades preK-5. One thing that makes the school different is the assessments. The assessments come in countless forms, from writing assignments to computer-graded quizzes to one-on-one conversations. Each teacher goal is to find the right activity and technology to fill in the gaps in the students' knowledge. The teachers do it by playing to the students strengths to help the succeeded in learning. An example given is a student who is disinterested in reading and writing, so the student has elected to work on creating comics, where good writing is essential and every word counts.
The problem with differentiating instruction is that it takes time with technology or not.  Forest Lake teachers tackle this challenge by using the technology to simplify other parts of their jobs, sharing their best ideas, and divvying up some of the work. The teachers use software to do much of the basic-skills practice and assessment to save the time. They use computer can identify specific weaknesses in a child's skills, such as understanding analogies or adding fractions. Teachers can review these outcomes daily, then assign lessons to each student according to her needs so that the next time she logs on, the program will give practice assignments on precisely what the student is missing.
There are several excuses why you can’t us technology in the classroom, but Forest Lake has solved those excuses with a step at a time. An example most schools say their facility can’t do it because it’s old.  The school has a 53-year-old building and it makes it work. They even as go as far how older teachers can improve with technology. They solved it with one trick at a time, with a lot of help from the school and each other.
 
Reflection in my classroom
The article shows how any school can become a technological school. They show how far they have come and what they have accomplished. I liked how it points in this day and age a teacher must use technology. “It can't be optional, but you cannot set those expectations unless you're backing them up with tech support and professional development.” It’s so true because in order to have technology it must add on to the learning not just have it there to add a TEKS to your lesson plan. I love how it the article gave a timeline on how they were able to become a technological school. They started with some two interactive whiteboards on carts to music equipment. We as a district can make this our school if we do it right.

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Entry 4: The Day after Spring Break



Spring Break for our district has arrived and left as fast it showed up.  It was the first day back and nobody wanted to be here, but we managed the day.  Before we left Spring Break I decided to prepare for the dreadful Monday when we returned. When the students left for spring break, I looked around my room and decided that the room arrangement needed to improve for better management. In another words I did a little spring cleaning to give it a new vibe in my class. I took down some of my old posters and put new ones that deal with my next unit that I am going to teach and cool posters I had found when shopping. I even found some movie posters that have some historical facts to brighten the room and show how watching some movies can help you in history.  I change the seating arrangement for the students to try something new and test it out.
            The Monday after the students return from any break can be considered another first day of school for many. Well I took advantage of it and I decided to play jeopardy with the students to review on what they had learned so far. I first divided the class into two teams from a list I had made before. I decide which team starts by using a coin toss.  It’s like regular Jeopardy except If Team One misses the question, Team Two gets to answer the question and get the points if they answer correctly. This to me encouraged both sides to pay attention while the other team is answering questions and not get distracted or bored, and consequently get in trouble. I have learned if you don't keep their attention, problems will follow and the review idea would have been wasted.  For Daily Double questions, I decided groups must decide how much to wager and lose that amount from their total if the question is missed. The other team cannot answer the Daily Double question if missed by the other team. Just like regular jeopardy the one with the most points win.
            It was a success in all my classes because everyone remembered what they had learned or learned what they need to know. It was a great review and the students loved it a lot. Now that we survived spring break  now its time to get back to the road of STARR. The whole purpose of today was to review what they knew and focus on what they need to know for the STARR test, but who says we couldn’t have fun doing it. 

In regards Mr. Vega